NEWS AND INSIGHTS | INSIGHTS

CIO Notebook: Investors Look Past February CPI as Energy Prices Skyrocket

3月 12, 2026
Shannon Saccocia, CFA, Chief Investment Officer - Wealth

We remain constructive on quality equities and a diversified global approach, while also seeing opportunity in fixed income – particularly duration – and believe the Fed still retains the latitude to cut rates over the course of the year.

U.S. core CPI for the month of February was in line both month-over-month (MoM) at +0.2% and year-over-year (YoY) at +2.5%. Headline CPI was on target as well, up +0.3% MoM and up +2.4% YoY. Of note, core CPI on a YoY basis is falling to levels not seen since 2021 – an accomplishment investors would most likely cheer if it were occurring in a different macro environment.

Driving the print were shelter prices, which rose by +0.2% for the second month in a row. Owners’ equivalent rent was up +0.2% while rents rose by only +0.1%. Food prices were higher than in January, up +0.4%, with the underlying constituents reflecting meaningful month-to-month volatility. Energy prices were up +0.6%, driven by higher fuel oil costs (+1.1%), while gasoline was up +0.8%. Evidence of tariff impacts in household furnishings (+3.9% YoY) and apparel (+2.5% YoY) were offset by used cars (-3.2% YoY ) and motor vehicle insurance (+0.2% YoY). Airfares and medical care continue to come in higher than the headline, up +1.4% MoM and +0.5% MoM, respectively.

In our view, there are two main takeaways from today’s release. First, inflation was trending in the right direction prior to the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, but the delta versus expectations is likely not enough to offset the sharp increase in energy prices and the potential for more meaningful pass-through impacts. While U.S. consumers are better insulated from higher energy prices given domestic production and supply diversification, the rapid increase in gasoline costs could dampen consumption in the short-term. Should the conflict persist, higher energy costs will likely pass through to other goods as well, potentially disrupting the disinflationary trend.

Second, there is likely to be dispersion between the CPI and PCE in February given the differences in their calculation. With shelter accounting for 32% of the CPI calculation, and only 15% of the PCE calculation, the progress made in shelter prices fails to move the needle in the same manner for PCE, and higher costs for healthcare and other services have a more meaningful effect. As a result, the Fed could be faced with a still lackluster labor market, higher energy costs, and a core PCE reading that is a bit hotter – a tougher backdrop for continued interest rate cuts.

The catalyst for a narrative shift would be a de-escalation in the Middle East, as it would focus the analysis back to the potential for stronger economic growth in the second half of 2026, led in large part by a still engaged U.S. consumer. Should energy prices trend back even to where they were in February, it would likely result in stronger consumer confidence and higher level of comfort in plowing tax refunds back into the economy. With strikes intensifying over the last several days, however, and reports that Iran is laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz to further disrupt supply, it is difficult for investors to look past what we believe will be a relatively short shelf life in terms of market impact of the conflict. We also believe that the Fed will have the latitude to move interest rates lower over the course of the year, which should support both consumer and business activity.

We remain committed to aligning portfolios in accordance with long-term strategic allocations. While adjustments made in the short-term may appear tactical, or even produce discomfort given the increased volatility, it is our view that a disciplined, steady approach is critical to delivering the desired outcome over the course of an economic and market cycle. We remain open to an evolution of our views where appropriate, but, at this juncture, we continue to be constructive on quality equities, and dedicated to a more diversified, global approach; we are also encouraged by the opportunities we see in fixed income markets, particularly as it relates to duration.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated, returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Portfolio positioning views expressed herein are those of Neuberger Berman’s Private Wealth Investment Group, which may include those of the Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee. Asset allocation and positioning views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The Private Wealth Investment Group analyzes market and economic indicators to develop asset allocation strategies. The Private Wealth Investment Group works in partnership with the Office of the CIO. The Private Wealth Investment Group also consults regularly with portfolio managers and investment officers across the firm. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large, diversified mandates. Asset Allocation Committee members are polled on asset classes and the positional views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee or the Private Wealth Investment Group. The Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Defensive positioning generally means an underweight bias on allocations to risk assets such as equities and alternatives. Positioning views may change over time without notice and actual client positioning may vary significantly. Discussion of yield characteristics or total returns of different asset classes are for illustrative purposes only. Such asset classes, such as equities and fixed income, may have significantly different overall risk-return characteristics which should be consider before investing.

The information in this material may contain projections, market outlooks or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, including economic, asset class and market outlooks or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events, outlook and expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different than that shown here. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including any bull/bear markets, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future be market/economic cycles or behavior. Information on historical observations about asset or sub-asset classes is not intended to represent or predict future events. Historical trends do not imply, forecast or guarantee future results. Information is based on current views and market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.

Discussions of any specific sectors and companies are for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this content should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors.

Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is a registered investment adviser.

The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.