While the Fed is likely to cut interest rates 3-4 times this year, there is little in the data at this juncture to force a move in March.
As expected, the Federal Reserve (Fed) announced no change in the target range of the federal funds rate of 5.25 – 5.50% for the fourth straight meeting. While interest rate policy is always in focus, expectations for a rate cut in this meeting were incredibly low. The focus, instead, was on the statement and the narrative communicated by Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
As a reminder, following December’s meeting, the Fed changed the language of the statement in an attempt to open the door for easing in the coming months; their January statement indicates that Fed watchers may need to be a bit more patient as they wait for that change. While acknowledging the reacceleration of U.S. economic growth in the fourth quarter, the Fed in their statement said it believes that “the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are moving into better balance.” However, the Fed also noted that it is unlikely to reduce the federal funds target rate “until it has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainability toward 2%.” There were no changes to its previously announced plans to roll a maximum of $60 billion of Treasuries and $35 billion of mortgage-backed securities off of the balance sheet each month.
During the press conference, Powell delivered a more nuanced assessment of the Fed’s challenge:
First, he recognized that the last six months of inflation data is good enough to support a move towards more accommodative policy but that the Fed would like to see more months of data as confirmation. He also attributed much of the progress to the strong disinflationary trend in goods and noted that it would be necessary for services and shelter to contribute more to that trend in order to deliver the Fed’s goal.
Second, Powell stated that while the Fed had telegraphed that slower economic growth and a weaker labor market would likely be required to deliver target inflation, he believes that it is now possible that inflation could continue to decline even without a meaningful economic contraction and/or higher unemployment. While he was unwilling to use the term “soft landing,” we believe it is clear in the comments that the Fed sees the probability of that scenario rising over the past several months.
Third, Powell acknowledged that he believes the Fed is now in “risk management mode.” To cut rates, the Fed needs to have greater confidence that inflation and inflation expectations will anchor at 2%. He believes that the labor market is normalizing but expressed that a strong economy could reignite inflationary pressures – he also admitted that maintaining restrictive policy longer than necessary would be just as unwise.
Finally, he stated that while there were no changes in balance sheet management in this meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee intends to take up the topic in its March meeting. He also admitted that any changes to the federal funds rates and quantitative tightening could be done in tandem or independently.
Overall, while attempting to provide a balanced assessment of the economy and policy, it was Powell’s admission that he does not believe the Fed will achieve the level of confidence necessary to cut rates in March that drove Thursday’s market reaction. All major U.S. equity indices declined following the release of the Fed’s statement while yields moved higher following the press conference. Interestingly, despite these moves, CME Fedwatch expectations for a rate cut in the March meeting have changed little over the last week, hovering around a 40% probability for such a move.
Our view is that while the Fed is likely to cut interest rates three to four times this year, there is little in the data at this juncture to force a move in March. The impetus for such a move would likely be a sharp deterioration in economic data rather than a surprise in terms of inflation slowing more quickly than expected. The Fed is conscious of the risk of reaccelerating inflation and with the U.S. economy still strong, there is likely little downside to getting a few more confirmatory data points before embarking on what is likely to be a multi-faceted shift toward monetary policy normalization.
Related Content
VIDEO
Holly Newman Kroft Discussed Her Post Election Insights
MARKET COMMENTARY
Navigating the Uncertainty Before the Certainty
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: As a New Administration Waits in the Wings, the Fed Keeps Cuts Coming
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated, returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Portfolio positioning views expressed herein are those of Neuberger Berman’s Private Wealth Investment Group, which may include those of the Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee. Asset allocation and positioning views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The Private Wealth Investment Group analyzes market and economic indicators to develop asset allocation strategies. The Private Wealth Investment Group works in partnership with the Office of the CIO. The Private Wealth Investment Group also consults regularly with portfolio managers and investment officers across the firm. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large diversified mandates. Asset Allocation Committee members are polled on asset classes and the positional views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee or the Private Wealth Investment Group. The Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Defensive positioning generally means an underweight bias on allocations to risk assets such as equities and alternatives. Positioning views may change over time without notice and actual client positioning may vary significantly. Discussion of yield characteristics or total returns of different asset classes are for illustrative purposes only. Such asset classes, such as equities and fixed income, may have significantly different overall risk-return characteristics which should be consider before investing.
The information in this material may contain projections, market outlooks or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, including economic, asset class and market outlooks or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events, outlook and expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different than that shown here. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including any bull/bear markets, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future be market/economic cycles or behavior. Information on historical observations about asset or sub-asset classes is not intended to represent or predict future events. Historical trends do not imply, forecast or guarantee future results. Information is based on current views and market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Discussions of any specific sectors and companies are for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this content should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors.
Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is a registered investment adviser.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC