We believe that the slowdown in hiring is not a cause for fear, but rather an indication of the normalization that it is necessary to achieve the soft landing scenario.
August’s non-farm payrolls release indicated that the U.S. economy added +142k jobs in the month – once again below the consensus of +165k. Admittedly, there were indications over the past two weeks that the risk was for a lighter print as ADP private payrolls and the ISM Manufacturing PMI survey pointed to a weaker level of hiring. Breaking down the data, this month’s gains were consistent with more recent prints, with leisure & hospitality, construction, health care, and government hiring leading the way; these sectors added +46k, +34k, +31k, and +24k respectively. Conversely, manufacturing hiring declined meaningfully, down -24k in the month –this is reflective of the low levels of activity reported via other sources. Revisions were to the downside as well, with June and July payrolls at +118k and +89k respectively. For context, the trailing 12-month average now stands at +202k.
The unemployment rate fell back to 4.2% for the month, as the participation rate remained steady at 62.7%. The decline in the unemployment was attributable in large part to the reversal of much of the spike in temporary layoffs in July’s release and was widely expected. Wages came in slightly stronger than expected, up +0.4% month-over-month and +3.8% year-over-year, and hours worked were also slightly higher, to 34.3 from 34.2 hours – reversing last month’s decline.
We believe consideration of other recent employment data points bears worth mentioning when drawing a conclusion on the impact of today’s release. Earlier this week, the July JOLTS report showed a marked decline in job openings to 7.7 million, marking the fourth decline in the figure in the last five months. However, initial jobless claims, which have historically been significant in forecasting a protracted weakening in the labor market, fell once again on Thursday to +227k; continuing claims were also lower. As mentioned above, manufacturing employment appears to be weakening as well, but the employment component of the ISM Services PMI, while admittedly down slightly from July to August, is still reflecting economic expansion in the more impactful areas of the U.S. economy.
When taken together, we believe that the slowdown in hiring is not a cause for fear, but rather an indication of the normalization that it is necessary to achieve the soft landing scenario so desperately desired and now widely expected. Cracks in consumer confidence and spending have appeared, but with wages pacing ahead of inflation, the sharp decline in the savings rate could stabilize along with CPI. The availability of full-time employment has historically been the driver of consumer confidence and we do not see enough signs today of the level of contraction necessary to hinder consumer spending to the magnitude that would be required to tip the U.S. economy into recession in the next few quarters.
In our view, the proverbial ball now sits in the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) court, and they are faced with a tough decision in their upcoming meeting which concludes on September 18th. Speaker after speaker has laid the groundwork for a cut but the decision to effect either a 25 basis point or 50 basis point decrease has implications for both equity and bond investors. While the rationale for a 50 basis point cut could be constructed, and would not be inconsistent with the Fed’s narrative, equity markets could look through that decision and interpret it as the Fed believing the economy slowing faster than anticipated – particularly given the strong performance of stocks already this year. Alternately, a 50 basis point cut could be celebrated by the markets, as it would point to a Fed that is attempting to avoid a policy error so often made – cutting too little too late. In addition, a stronger move out of the gate could be an appeasement to the members of the FOMC who believed a July cut was justified by inflation data even before the disappointing July jobs report was released.
With a little less than two weeks until their meeting, there is still a lot of ground to cover before the Fed makes its decision. Our view is that the Fed will likely cut 25 basis points but will indicate strongly that it will be aggressive in moving towards the neutral rate, even as the U.S. economy remains on fairly solid footing. This sets up for continued cuts through the end of the year and through the first half of 2025. As such, it is imperative to review in particular current cash positions to determine better opportunities for return. More broadly, with the Fed decision coming at the height of U.S. Presidential campaigning – a notoriously choppy time for markets – we stand ready to take advantage of the volatility to position portfolios in alignment with the best ideas of our teams.
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Inflation Print Supportive of Continued but Patient Fed Easing
INSIGHTS
Personal Taxes and the Election
MARKET COMMENTARY
The First Cut May Be the Deepest
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: September Payrolls Show Soft Landing Still on Track
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: The Fed Takes a Big Step on a New Path
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Inflation Takes a Back Seat to Jobs as the Fed Readies Cuts
INSIGHTS
Holly Newman Kroft Discussed Investing Around the 2024 Election
MARKET COMMENTARY
Doves Call After Volatility Squall
VIDEO
Holly Newman Kroft Discussed the Character of the Current Market
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: With Inflation in Line, Focus Shifts to Jackson Hole
Accolades
Forbes/SHOOK 2024 List of Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-in-State
MARKET COMMENTARY
Change Becomes July’s Constant
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: August Brings Volatility – But Will It Last?
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated, returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Portfolio positioning views expressed herein are those of Neuberger Berman’s Private Wealth Investment Group, which may include those of the Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee. Asset allocation and positioning views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The Private Wealth Investment Group analyzes market and economic indicators to develop asset allocation strategies. The Private Wealth Investment Group works in partnership with the Office of the CIO. The Private Wealth Investment Group also consults regularly with portfolio managers and investment officers across the firm. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large diversified mandates. Asset Allocation Committee members are polled on asset classes and the positional views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee or the Private Wealth Investment Group. The Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Defensive positioning generally means an underweight bias on allocations to risk assets such as equities and alternatives. Positioning views may change over time without notice and actual client positioning may vary significantly. Discussion of yield characteristics or total returns of different asset classes are for illustrative purposes only. Such asset classes, such as equities and fixed income, may have significantly different overall risk-return characteristics which should be consider before investing.
The information in this material may contain projections, market outlooks or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, including economic, asset class and market outlooks or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events, outlook and expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different than that shown here. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including any bull/bear markets, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future be market/economic cycles or behavior. Information on historical observations about asset or sub-asset classes is not intended to represent or predict future events. Historical trends do not imply, forecast or guarantee future results. Information is based on current views and market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Discussions of any specific sectors and companies are for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this content should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors.
Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is a registered investment adviser.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC