We are proud to recognize three teams ranked in Barron’s 250 Private Wealth Management teams for 2025.
The Barron’s Top 250 Private Wealth Management Teams List is comprised of wealth advisory teams that specialize in serving individuals and families. The teams are ranked on a variety of factors, including their size and shape, their regulatory records and credentials of their members, and the resources they have at their disposal to serve their client bases.
Congratulations to our advisors named in Barron’s Top 250 Private Wealth Management Teams for 2025:
| TEAM NAME | 2025 RANKING |
|---|---|
| Finkel Hamerling Allan Team | #75 |
| Stiefel Bronstein Team | #90 |
| Peterson Team | #189 |
INSIGHTS
Fraud Protection Across an Evolving Threatscape
INSIGHTS
The Gap Between Knowing and Doing
INSIGHTS
Market Outlook: Growing Pains
INSIGHTS
Before the Ink Dries: Key Planning Steps Prior to an IPO, Merger or Sale
INSIGHTS
Fixed Income: Takeaways Amid Turbulence
INSIGHTS
2026 Year-End Wealth Planning Checklist
INSIGHTS
Liquidity Events: Positioning Portfolios for the Future
INSIGHTS
Investment Lens: Looking Past the Midterms
MUNICIPAL BASIS POINTS
Gauging Municipal Volatility—and Opportunity
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Another Hot CPI Report Puts October Hike Back in Play
VIDEO
Holly Newman Kroft Featured on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street October 13, 2026
MARKET COMMENTARY
Technology Provides a Port in the Storm
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: September Payrolls Likely Take October Fed Hike Off the Table
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
The 2025 Barron’s “Top 1,200 Financial Advisors” rankings listed the top private wealth management teams in the United States. Barron's is a registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company, L.P. All rights reserved. Advisors who wish to be ranked fill out a 102-question survey about their practice. Barron’s verifies that data with the advisors’ firms and with regulatory databases and then apply their rankings formula to the data to generate a ranking. The formula features three major categories of calculations: (1) Assets, (2) Revenue and (3) Quality of practice. In each of those categories, Barron’s does multiple sub-calculations. In evaluating advisors, Barron’s also considered the type of assets and qualitative factors, such as advisors’ experience, their advanced degrees and industry designations, the size and shape of their teams, their charitable and philanthropic work, and their compliance records. Investment performance was not an explicit criterion because performance is often a function of each client’s appetite for risk. Third-party accolades referenced do not reflect the experiences of any Neuberger Berman client and readers should not view such information as representative of any particular client’s experience or assume that they will have a similar investment experience as any previous or existing client. Third-party accolades are not indicative of the past or future performance of any Neuberger Berman product or service.
Third-party accolades referenced do not reflect the experiences of any Neuberger Berman client and readers should not view such information as representative of any particular client’s experience or assume that they will have a similar investment experience as any previous or existing client. Third-party accolades are not indicative of the past or future performance of any Neuberger Berman product or service.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.